Development of Buccal adhesive formulations using in-situ formation of interpolymer complex and optimization using Box-Benhken design

Authors

  • Amit Gupta School of Pharmacy and Technology Management SVKM’s NMIMS Deemed University Mumbai- 400056 Maharastra India.
  • Ram S. Gaud School of Pharmacy and Technology Management SVKM’s NMIMS Deemed University Mumbai- 400056 Maharastra India
  • S. Ganga School of Pharmacy and Technology Management SVKM’s NMIMS Deemed University Mumbai- 400056 Maharastra India

Keywords:

Bioadhesive, Nisoldipine, Gantrez, Polyvinyl povidone, BoxBehnken design, Polynomial equation

Abstract

Extended release bioadhesive buccal tablets for delivery of Nisoldipine were developed using in-situ formation of interpolymer complex providing significantly different attributes to that of individual polymers. When tablet made up of Gantrez and Povidone comes in contact with aqueous solution, complexation through the hydrogen bond formation takes place which was characterized by Infrared spectroscopy. Interpolymer complex resulted to reduced solubility of polymer. A Box-Behnken factorial design was selected to explore effects on bioadhesive strength and drug release by interaction of Gantrez and Povidone. Such effects were confirmed by significant regression coefficient having p less than 0.05. Three check points were also taken into account to validate the polynomial equation. Results show that polymers change the drug release mechanism which is confirmed by model fitting into dissolution point. By optimizing the ratio of polymers to achieve desired release (90%) in the sixth hour and good BAS were obtained for batch G17.

References

Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic

drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharm Sci.

;1:15-30.

Torre PM, Torrado S, Torrado S. Interpolymer

complexes of poly(acrylic acid) and chitosan:

influence of the ionic hydrogel-forming medium.

Biomaterials 2003;24(8):1459–68.

Takayama K, Hirata M, Machida Y, Masada T,

Sannan T, Nagai T. Effect of interpolymer

complex formation on bioadhesive property and

drug release phenomenon of compressed tablet

consisting of chitosan and sodium hyaluroate.

Chem Pharm Bull. 1990;38(7):1993–7.

Hao JS, Chan LW, Shen, Heng PWS.

Complexation Between PVP and Gantrez Polymer

and Its Effect on Release and Bioadhesive

Properties of the Composite PVP/Gantrez Films,

Pharm Dev Tech. 2004;9(4):379–86.

International speciality/ Gantrez® copolymer

technical profiles products; Wayne, USA.

http://www.ispcorp.com. Accessed 04 Oct 2009.

Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Owen SC, editors.

Handbook of Pharmaceutical excipients.

Pharmaceutical press; 2006.

Chuna MK, Chob CS, Choia HK. Mucoadhesive

drug carrier based on interpolymer complex of

poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly(acrylic acid)

prepared by template polymerization. J Control

Release. 2002;81:327–334.

Takayama K, Nagai T. Application of interpolymer

complexation of polyvinylpyrrolidone/

carboxyvinyl polymer to control of drug release.

Chem Pharm Bull. 1987;35(12):4921–7.

Satoh K, Takayama K, Machida Y, Suzuki Y,

Nakagaki M, Nagai T. Factors affecting the

bioadhesive property of tablets consisting of

hydroxypropyl cellulose and carboxyvinyl

polymer. Chem Pharm Bull. 1989;37(5):1366–8.

Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some new three level

designs for the study of quantitative variables.

Technometrics. 1960;2(4):455-75.

Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of

buccoadhesive strength of muco-adhesive buccal

tablets: design of an in-vitro assembly. Indian

Drugs. 1992;30:152-55.

Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Design and

characterization of chitosan-containing

mucoadhesive buccal patches of propranolol

hydrochloride. Acta Pharm. 2007;57:61–72.

Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Formulation,

Evaluation, and Comparison of Bilayered and

Multilayered Mucoadhesive Buccal Devices of

Propranolol Hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech.

;8(1):Article 22.

Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel HV, Patel KM.

Mucoadhesive Bilayer Tablets of Propranolol

Hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech.

;8(3):Article 54.

Russo PB, Caviglioli G, Cafaggi S, Bignardi G.

Development and characterization of a

buccoadhesive dosage form of oxycodone

hydrochloride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1996;22:445-

Taylor LS, Zografi G. Spectroscopic

characterization of interactions between PVP and

indomethacin indomethacin in amorphous

molecular dispersions. Pharm Res.

;14(12):1691–8.

Wolfs I, Desseyn HO. Hydrogen bond patterns in

solid state carboxylic acids. Vibrational study of

the hydrogen bond patterns in oxamic, malonamic

and succinamic acid. Spectrochim Acta Part A.

;51(10):1601–15.

Shamblin SL, Taylor LS, Zografi G. Mixing

bahavior of colyophilized binary systems. J Pharm

Sci. 1998;87(6):694–701.

Park H, Robinson JR. Mechanisms of bioadhesion

of polyacrylic acid hydrogels. Pharm Res.

;4:457-64.

Singh B, Chakkal SK, Ahuja N. Formulation and

optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive

tablets of atenolol using response surface

methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech

;7(1):Article 3.

Singh B, Ahuja N. Development of controlledrelease buccoadhesive hydrophilic matrices of

diltiazem hydrochloride: optimization of

bioadhesion, dissolution and diffusion parameters.

Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:431–42.

Ponchel G, Touchard F, Duchene D, Peppas NA.

Buccoadhesive analysis of controlled release

systems. I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in

poly(acrylic acid) containing systems. J Control

Release. 1987;5:129–41.

Jacques Y, Buri P. An investigation of the physical

behavior of moisture-activated mucoadhesive

hydrogels upon contact with biological and nonbiological substrates. Pharm Acta Helv.

;72:225–32.

Fabregas JL, Garcia N. In-vitro studies on

buccoadhesive tablet formulations of

hydrocortisone hemisuccinate. Drug Dev Ind

Pharm. 1995;21(14):1689–96.

Parodi B, Russo E, Caviglioli G, Cafaggi S,

Bignardi G. Development and characterization of a

buccoadhesive dosage form of oxycodone

hydrochloride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm.

;22(5):445–50.

Bottenberg P, Cleymaet R.; Muynck C, Remon JP,

Coomans D, Michotte Y. Development and testing

of bioadhesive fluoride containing slow release

tablets for oral use. J Pharm Pharmacol.

;43:457–64.

Ramana MV, Nagda C, Himaja M. Design and

evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery

systems containing metoprolol tartrate. Ind j Pharm

science. 2007;69(4):515-18.

Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel HV, Patel KM.

Mucoadhesive Bilayer Tablets of Propranolol

Hydrochloride. AAPS PharmaSciTech.

;8(3):Article 77.

Geresha S, Gdalevsky GY, Gilboa I, Voorspoels J,

Remon JP, Kost J. Bioadhesive grafted starch

copolymers as platforms for peroral drug delivery:

a study of theophylline release. J Control Release.

;94:391–9.

Chopra S, Patil GV, Motwani SK. Release

modulating hydrophilic matrix systems of losartan

potassium: Optimization of formulation using

statistical experimental design. Eur J Pharm

Biopharm. 2007;66:73–82.

Costa P, Ferreira DC, Lobo JMS. Nitroglicerina

em sistemas de libertac¸a˜o transde´rmica -

Determinac¸a˜o da velocidade de libertac¸a˜o. Rev

Port Farm. 1996;46:4–8.

Bhanja RS, Pal TK. In-vitro release kinetics of

salbutamol, sulphate microcapsules coated with

both Eudragit RS 100 and Eudragit RL 100. Drug

Dev Ind Pharm. 1994;20:375–86.

Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian

drug release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv.

;60:110–11.

Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of

buccoadhesive strength of buccoadhesive buccal

tablets: Design of an in vitro assembly. Indian

Drugs. 1993;30:152–55.

Downloads

Published

03/31/2010

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles