Development and Evaluation of Dry Powder Inhalation System of Terbutaline Sulphate for Better Management of Asthma

Authors

  • Deepak. J. Singh Bombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400 098, India,
  • Jayesh J. Parmar Bombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400 098, India,
  • Darshana D. Hegde Bombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400 098, India,
  • Atul A. Lohade Bombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400 098, India
  • Pritamsingh Soni Board of Radiation and Isotope Technology & Medical Cyclotron Facility, Parel, Mumbai, India
  • Abdul Samad Department of Medicine, Bombay Veterinary College, Parel, Mumbai, India.
  • Mala D. Menon ombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400 098, India

Keywords:

Turbutaline sulphate, microspheres, pulmonary delivery, Dry powder inhalation

Abstract

Terbutaline sulphate (TBS), a bronchodilator (β2 agonist) has a short half-life, hence frequent administration (4-6 times a day) is necessary, resulting in patient compliance problems. Therefore long acting TBS inhalation formulations are desirable to improve patient compliance, reduce toxicity and hence achieve better management of asthma. Microparticulate dry powder inhalation delivery systems for sustained pulmonary drug delivery have been particularly attractive. In the present investigation, TBS loaded chitosan microspheres for pulmonary delivery were prepared by emulsification and ionotropic gelation method. The microspheres were characterized for drug content, particle size, densities, flow properties, moisture content and surface topography by SEM; in vitro drug release was evaluated in simulated lung fluid at 370 at pH 7.4. The respirable or fine particle fraction (FPF) was determined by using twin stage impinger (TSI). Further stability evaluation of TBS loaded DPI systems was carried out at 250/ 60% RH and at 400C/ 75% RH.

References

Courrier H.M.; Butz N.; and Vandamme T.F.

Pulmonary drug delivery systems: Recent

developments and prospects. Crit. Rev.

Therpeut. Drug Carrier Systems 2002, 19, 425-

Groneberg D.A.; Witt C.; Wagner U.; Chung K.

F. and Fischer A. Fundamentals of pulmonary

drug delivery. Respir. Med. 2003, 97, 382-387.

Zeng X. M.; Martin G. P.; and Marriott C. The

controlled delivery of drugs to the lung. Int. J.

Pharm. 1995;124: 149-164.

Witek T. J. The Fate of Inhaled Drugs: The

pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of

drugs administered by aerosol. Respir. Care

, 45, 826-830.

Clark A. R. Pulmonary Delivery Technology:

Recent Advances and Potential for the New

Millennium. In: Anthony J. Hickey editor.

Pharmaceutical Inhalation Aerosol Technology.

nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 2004.

-84.

Byron P. R. Prediction of drug residence times

in regions of the human respiratory tract

following aerosol inhalation. J. Pharm. Sci.

, 75, 433-438.

Shenfield G. M.; Evans M. E. and Paterson J.

W. Absorption of drugs by the lung. Br. J. Clin.

Pharm. 1976, 3,1218-1223.

Adjei A. and Gupta P. Dry-powder inhalation

aerosols. In A. L. Adjei A. L., P. K. Gupta

(eds.), Inhalation Delivery of Therapeutic

Peptides and Proteins. M. Dekker, New York.

, 625–665.

Weers J. Dispersible powders for inhalation

applications. Innov. Pharm. Technol. 2000,

,111-116.

Duddu S.; Sisk S. and Walter Y. Improved lung

delivery from a passive dry powder inhaler

using an engineered PulmoSphere powder.

Pharm. Res. 2002, 19, 689-695.

Smolensky M. H.; D’Alonzo G. E.; Kunkel G.

and Barnes P. J. Day-night patterns in bronchial

patency and dyspnoea: Basis for one daily and

unequally divided twice daily dosing schedules.

Chronobio. Int. 1987, 4,303-307.

Moebus K.; Siepmann J. and Bodmeier R.

Alginate–poloxamer microparticles for

controlled drug delivery to mucosal tissue.

Europ. J. Pharma. And Biopharm.2009, 72 (1),

-53.

Martinac A.; Filipovic-Grcic J.; Voinovich D.;

Perissutti B. and Franceschinis E. Development

and bioadhesive properties of chitosanethylcellulose microspheres for nasal delivery,

Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 291, 69-77.

Mi F.; Wong T.; Shyu S. and Chang S. Chitosan

microspheres: modification of polymeric anti--

physical properties of spray dried microspheres

to control the release of antibiotic drug. J. Appl.

Polm. Sci. 1999, 71, 747–759.

Berthold K.; Cremer J. and Kreuter J.

Preparation and characterization of chitosan

microspheres as drug carrier for prednisolone

sodium phosphate as model for antiinflammatory drugs, J. Control. Release. 1996,

, 17–25.

Lamprecht A.; Helena R.; Ulrich S. and ClausMichael L. Biodegradable microparticles as a

two-drug controlled release formulation: a

potential treatment of inflammatory bowel

disease. J. Control. Release. 2000, 69, 445–454.

Peniche C.; Waldo A.; Hazel P. and Niuris A.

Chitosan: An attractive biocompatible polymer

for microencapsulation, Macromol. Biosci.

, 3, 511–520.

Anal A.; Willem F. and Carmen R. Ionotropic

cross-linked chitosan microspheres for

controlled release of ampicillin, Int. J. Pharm.

, 312, 166–173.

Lim L.; Wan L. and Thai P. Chitosan

microspheres prepared by emulsification and

ionotropic gelation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.

, 23, 981–985.

Nishioka Y.; Kyotani S.; Okamura M.;

Miyazaki M.; Okazaki K.; Ohnishi S.;

Yamamoto Y. and Ito K. Release characteristics

of cisplatin chitosan microspheres and effect of

containing chitin. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990, 38,

–2873.

Staniforth J. Improvement in dry powder inhaler

performance: Surface passivation effects. 1996,

Proc. Drug Delivery Lungs (London) VII, 86–

Lucas P.; Anderson K.; Potter U. and Staniforth

J. Enhancement of small particle size dry

powder aerosol formulations using an ultra low

density additive. Pharm. Res. 1999,16, 1643–

Louey M.; Razia S. and Stewart P. Influence of

physicochemical carrier properties on the in

vitro aerosol deposition from interactive

mixtures. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 252 (1–2), 87–98.

Downloads

Published

06/30/2010

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles